According to Leibniz’s philosophy, the best possible world is the one which harmonizes social relations and generates goodness and perfection.
The harmonious world relies on metaphysical goodness that is typical of all lifeless creatures.
If there is a chance that God had to choose between these two variants, the last variant should be the most obvious.
Certainly, a world with living creatures observing moral rules should be better than the one in which these principles are absent.
On the one hand, God personifies an absolute goodness, which implies developing the best of all possible worlds.
Argument Analysis Essay Example Marketing Assignment Help
On the other hand, the freedom of choices admits the possibility that God can choose inferior world.Moreover, the Creator is the one who chooses the best possible world; He would not have selected a worse world because God did not plan to create worse world.One way or another, God always has choice whether it is necessary to create the most appropriate world or not.If Good embodies perfection, there is no possibility for creating imperfect world and, therefore, bad actions and vices are created for sufficient reason as well.Evil is created by God because nothing in this world exists independently from God.Therefore, by posing the argument about the existence of God, Leibniz refutes the possibility of evil existence because it would contradict the omnipotence of deity, as well as His aspiration to perfection.While developing the argument at issue, Leibniz tries to avoid the idea that everything is necessary because the philosopher believes that God is free from these limits.So, the Creator is responsible for the harmonious because He has a sufficient reason for it.Hence, the genesis of the world is not due to the necessity, but to God’s genuine moral nature, which is sufficient for the existence of the best possible world.Under these circumstances, the Divine creator faces three choices: forming an inferior world, choosing superior world, or creating no worlds.So, God’s decision to create the world, as compared to leaving everything unchanged, proves that the existing world is virtuous and harmonious.