Bloody Mary Research Paper

Other recent biographers (see Porter 2007, Richards 2008, and Whitelock 2009), while generally relying on traditional English sources, have contributed effectively to the reinterpretation of Mary as the true pioneer of female monarchy in the country, stressing her achievements and her role as precursor and example to Elizabeth.

Tags: Essay About Advantages And Disadvantages Of Living In CityCreative Writing ClubsShould Population Be Controlled EssayEssay On The Love Song Of J Alfred PrufrockPersuasive Speech On Eating Healthy EssaysIt Thesis Proposal

The best general bibliography for Mary and her reign is the Bibliography of British and Irish History.

More detailed accounts of recent bibliography on the subject are to be found in Duncan 2013 and Warnicke 2016.

Back in 1940, Prescott 2003 broke with traditional British historiography by researching and stressing Mary’s Spanish background and the Spanish dimension of her reign, though this aspect was not developed further until Edwards 2011 and Edwards 2016.

In the meantime, Loades (Loades 1989, Loades 2006, and Loades 2011) has been the leading historian of this queen and her reign, producing a series of biographies, overlapping but also developing in content and approach.

Consultation of the various calendars of English and foreign State Papers, now available online as well as in print, is essential for all who wish to undertake detailed research into the domestic and foreign policies of Mary’s government, as well as many important aspects of the England of her time, together with Wales and Ireland.

Equally valuable and indeed essential, especially for coverage of Mary’s seizure of the English throne and her earliest days in power, are various contemporary British and foreign chronicles.

Sometimes contradictory, these nonetheless offer insights into English society and politics, as well as foreign attitudes toward England and its queen.

The workings of the English government itself are covered in Dasent 1891–1892, Knighton 1998, and Maxwell 1924–1929, while foreign archives have been exploited in the compilation and editing of Tyler 1914–1954 and Brown 1867–1881.

Mary’s known personal literary output is very limited, and well presented in Prescott 2003 (cited under Personal Writings), but her governmental activity is thoroughly covered in the various calendars of State papers.

There are also chronicles that cover her reign and the period surrounding it.