With great pride, the narrator asserts that Miss Emily "carried her head high enough — even when we believed that she was fallen." Unlike the town, the narrator is proud to recognize the dignity with which she faces adversity.To hold one's head high, to confront disaster with dignity, to rise above the common masses, these are the attitudes of the traditional Southern aristocracy.
With great pride, the narrator asserts that Miss Emily "carried her head high enough — even when we believed that she was fallen." Unlike the town, the narrator is proud to recognize the dignity with which she faces adversity.To hold one's head high, to confront disaster with dignity, to rise above the common masses, these are the attitudes of the traditional Southern aristocracy.Tags: Essay Society ScienceYouth Violence EssayPerfect Sat EssayMsc Dissertation Writing ServicePearl Harbor Report EssayDual Economy ThesisHow To Write A Catering Business PlanSolve Venn Diagram Problems
Sometimes unabashedly and sometimes grudgingly, the narrator admires her ability to use her aristocratic bearing in order to vanquish the members of the city council or to buy poison.
The narrator also admires her aristocratic aloofness, especially in her disdain of such common matters as paying taxes or associating with lower-class people.
By using the "we" narrator, Faulkner creates a sense of closeness between readers and his story.
The narrator-as-the-town judges Miss Emily as a fallen monument, but simultaneously as a lady who is above reproach, who is too good for the common townspeople, and who holds herself aloof.
And yet, for a lover she chooses Homer Barron, a man of the lowest class, and more troubling than his social status is the fact that he is a Yankee.
Ironically, the narrator admires Miss Emily's high-and-mighty bearing as she distances herself from the gross, vulgar, and teeming world, even while committing one of the ultimate acts of desperation — necrophilia — with a low-life Yankee.The character of the narrator is better understood by examining the tone of the lines spoken by this "we" person, who changes his/her mind about Miss Emily at certain points in the narration. the men [went] through a sort of respectful affection for a fallen monument." Is the narrator saying that the town views Miss Emily respectfully? What has Miss Emily done to deserve the honor of being referred to as a "monument"?Consider the opening sentence of the story and the reasons given for the townspeople's attending Miss Emily's funeral: ". Once we discover that she has poisoned her lover and then slept with his dead body for an untold number of years, we wonder how the narrator can still feel affection for her.Denied natural outlets for her emotions, perhaps she is forced into madness or a fantasy world?Is she a victim, then, of time, the town, her father, or her own repressed sexuality?"A Rose for Emily" is a successful story not only because of its intricately complex chronology, but also because of its unique narrative point of view.Most critics incorrectly consider the narrator, who uses "we" as though speaking for the entire town, to be young, impressionable, and male; however, on close examination, we realize that the narrator is not young and is never identified as being either male or female.Are you sure you want to remove #book Confirmation# and any corresponding bookmarks?During the more than four decades since the first publication of William Faulkner's story "A Rose for Emily," two general questions seem to have attracted significant critical attention.In other words, Miss Emily should be courteous and kind to Homer, but she should not become sexually active with him.Once the town believes that Miss Emily is engaging in adultery, the narrator's attitude about her and Homer's affair changes from that of the town's.