While this is a good sample size, the problem lies with the distribution of the sample.The sample number for junior high coaches, in particular, is rather low.
While this is a good sample size, the problem lies with the distribution of the sample.Tags: Essay On Campus CleaningWas Hamlet Mad EssayEssay Topics For College StudentsEconomics Research Papers PakistanConstruction Management Graduate Cover LetterHelp Writing Descriptive EssaysVerbal Bullying Thesis StatementHandphones Should Be Allowed In School-EssayValue Chain Analysis Research Paper
The student who submitted this paper last semester earned a 100 on his critique. A succint summary is provided in the first paragraph.
This paper would have been even better if the student had added a sentence or two about the results of the study.
That way, after reading the first paragraph, the reader would know the purpose, hypotheses, and findings.
Next, the student described specifics about the research design, including the sample, instrumentation, and data analysis.
That's why you'll see some fairly complex explanations in this paper on the data analysis but no information on the literature review. Within the sample, 118 (0.73) of the coaches were male, while 44 (0.27) were female.
With regard to coaching level, 25 (0.15) were junior high coaches, 99 (0.61) high school, and 38 (0.24) at the college level.
When you engage in a critique you are demonstrating to your marker that: Critiquing means that you are developing an understanding of more than a single article: it means that you are developing an understanding of the 'big picture', of the discipline as a whole.
Later in your study you may be expected to contribute new understandings to the discipline, so it is important to understand the current state of knowledge.
One thing that was not discussed in this paper is the literature review. The second hypothesis was that differences on the RLSS would occur among coaching levels: junior high, high school, and college.
In previous classes we spent more time talking about statistics than the literature review. The sample was nonrandom, including 162 coaches that were chosen on a volunteer basis.