She goes on to investigate the connections in language and culture between revolutionary-era feminism and abolitionism.Tags: Application Letter For Medical ClaimLeo Tolstoy Essays ArtCompare Contrast Essay ThesisThesis For History DayHomework Help With MathSmall Essay On Global WarmingFun Problem Solving Activities For AdultsMath Problems For 1st GradeApa Rubric Research PaperDr. Roberto Assagioli Psychosynthesis
I hope Davidson is pursuing the topic further, especially any effects of interaction between the two movements.
The book’s third section is called “Consequences” and yet again I found this moniker misleading and reckon it may have more appropriately, if blandly, been labeled “Case Studies.” Ian Coller begins with an analysis of the French invasion of Egypt that, although he does not directly contradict the Orientalist orthodoxy of Edward Saïd (, 1978) aims to show the political and economic links between Egypt and France prior to conquest, and the similarities between Egypt and other French-conquered territories.
Instead, its authors seek to examine “the specifically French responses to the process of globalization” with the aim of explaining why the French Revolution, among so many others, had the most “far-reaching effects” (p. They contend that the “causes, internal dynamics, and consequences of the French Revolution all grew out of France’s increasing participation in the process of globalization” (p. Such an approach and argument is not entirely surprisingly given, for example, the recent emphasis on Saint-Domingue in French Revolution studies but also a trend towards the global/international/transnational in the historical discipline more generally. These essays began as conference presentations at the 2011 meeting of the Consortium on the Revolutionary Era in Tallahassee and at times reflect their origins: some lack the depth of original research that many readers may expect or wish to see; others are “safe” treatments of material that may not be novel or ground-breaking.
Even more boldly, the editors assert that by examining “a global framework” it is possible to bring “back social and economic factors” to the study of the Revolution “[w]ithout abandoning the political and cultural emphasis” and thereby bridge the two main historiographical and methodological approaches that have bifurcated since the Bicentenary (p. Sometimes an essay’s link to the theme of globalization or global perspective is tenuous.
Jainchill looks at the long-term effects of the 1685 revocation of the Edict of Nantes, which granted toleration to France protestant Huguenot population, for the 1789 revolution.
He describes how after their loss of rights in 1685, refugee Huguenots undermined the absolutist French monarchy by advocating in political writings for a more balanced, British-style constitution; translating the works of like-minded philosophers into French; and generally being involved in the book trade.All four of the first chapters therefore share a similar logic with respect to the origins of the Revolution.These essays do not displace or upset the current belief, grounded in political cultural analysis, that a variety of factors led to a gradual delegitimization and discrediting of the monarchy and a concomitant rising demand for accountability if not representation.How this dynamic is internal, and internal to what, I do not know--but it is great history.In chapter 6, Desan’s equally excellent contribution, she investigates how the August 1792 granting of French citizenship and political rights to foreigners reflected the universal aspirations of the Republic, especially as they relate to the renunciation of offensive wars and conquests.He argues that this “underground economy” stimulated popular protest, thereby delegitimizing state institutions that proved in desperate need of reform (p. His essay, which seemed to me a clever but not overwrought twist on Robert Darnton’s treatment of the “literary underground” (, 1982) included some fascinating insights--for example, that tax rebellions linked to repression of contraband trade were the most common form of revolt in France between 16.Hunt’s contribution in chapter 2, “The Global Financial Origins of 1789,” also contains moments of great perspicacity.The review you are about to read comes to you courtesy of H-Net -- its reviewers, review editors, and publishing staff. With their reach extending from the Middle East, across North Africa, to South America, and beyond, it is indeed timely to investigate perhaps the prototypical revolution, the French one of 1789, in a global perspective.If you appreciate this service, please consider donating to H-Net so we can continue to provide this service free of charge. Translate this review into Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013. .00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8014-5096-9; .95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-8014-7868-0. Kolla (Georgetown University) Published on H-Diplo (August, 2013) Commissioned by Seth Offenbach (Bronx Community College, The City University of New York) Pierre Serna ends this volume with the provocative claim that “[r]evolution never repeats itself, because it never ends” (p. Recently, many parts of the world have been gripped (again? This fine collection of essays--edited by Suzanne Desan, Lynn Hunt, and William Max Nelson--was not necessarily inspired by current events.Although the fiscal crisis of 1787-89 caused the Revolution, she claims that we do not yet know what really caused that fiscal crisis.In a wonderful reversal of received thinking, she argues that it was precisely Jacques Necker and Charles-Alexandre de Calonne were so successful at raising money in the early 1780s, “that helped bring on the fatal crisis” later (p. Two global processes impacted French finances: in the eighteenth century, France sought to extend its global commercial empire and was depended on international capital markets for the funds to do so.