Thus, because of this remarkable lack of change, time has no meaning, and if yesterday was meaningless, and the days before yesterday were also meaningless, then time itself must indeed be meaningless.
The meaningless of time, Beckett would argue, can be applied to the plight of all of humankind. Beckett denied a religious interpretation of and stated instead that the play’s many ambiguities hold the meaning.
Beckett 's Waiting for Godot Samuel Beckett 's two act tragicomedy Waiting for Godot depicts the endless wait for something better as told through the eyes of two homeless men named Vladimir and Estragon who have nowhere to go.
As both men wait for a person by the name of Godot, they find ways to pass time in the form of friendly banter, contemplating suicide, philosophical conversations and reminiscing about the past.
Just like the day before, each day has the same purpose—to wait for an unknown someone who never comes.
The men cannot tell one day from another: “I don't remember having met anyone yesterday.
Indeed, the main characters Vladimir and Estragon, who are at times difficult to tell apart because of their identical dialog, seem like twins.
For instance, in the opening line of the play Estragon announces “nothing to be done,” and a short while later, Vladimir recites the exact same line (1).
So, despite the author’s denial of a religious interpretation of the play, the numerous references to religion remain significant even if they are simply used by the author to illustrate the folly of religious faith and to help him argue his idea of textual uncertainty. In , Beckett argues that questions regarding the purpose of human life are unanswerable.
And, since there is no apparent meaning to life, as humans we are left miserable in an indifferent universe.