If the piece is to be read on a computer monitor, adding a blank line between paragraphs will make it much easier for your critics to read.
Note: when you submit the final version to print publishers, it is best to adhere to their manuscript format (no blank lines between paragraphs). How many times have you missed that in your writing because you passed over it without seeing it?
Was the story captivating from the very first few paragraphs? To just bash the story without providing something useful to the author is not really being professional. When you give an example of a better way to do what you pointed out, you make your point much clearer to the author. As [critics], don't we have a responsibility to not only point out what needs changing, as we see it, but also what worked and why, so the writer WON'T change it and will be encouraged to produce more of the same? Don't we often base our decision to buy or not buy upon those first few sentences? By conflict, I do not mean lots of slam-bam action. Did they have the potential to transform each other?
Do you think that the story or book has sales potential? Remember, the purpose of writing a critique is twofold: (1) identify the weaknesses in the piece and (2) offer some constructive advice to the author that might lead to improvement in the story. Why should all the mistakes find their targets, but the successes meet with only silence--leaving the poor writer, who has poured out her/his heart, with nothing but: no, no, no, ... We cannot grow, otherwise." - Pete Murphy "I think there's a sometimes overlooked purpose in critiquing and that is to identify the strengths in a story as well, to offer encouragement and positive reinforcement in regard to those strengths, thereby preventing the possibility that the author will change, for the worse, those things that make the story good." - Debra Littlejohn Shinder Opening Do the first few sentences or paragraphs of the story grab your attention? Remember how you judge a book or story when you first see it in a bookstore. Until the end, of course, when all the conflicts should be resolved. Is it expressed through action, dialogue, attitudes, or values? Or did they seem to be totally satisfied with their roles?
Stir up as many levels of conflict and problems for your protagonist (hero) as you can. And never, never, never solve a problem until you've raised at least two more.
Essay Critiquing Book Nickel And Dimed Essay
Resolution of conflict: Did the conflict and tension in the plots and subplots come to some reasonable ending?
Were there so many such errors that they made reading the piece difficult for you? For example, I once wrote "fruits of mother nature" and "thoughts burning in his mind", both of which are cliches.
In dialogue cliches are okay if the character would speak that way. For instance, I once wrote: "With tears in her eyes and barely able to speak, the head nurse dialed the Chief of Staff.
There are certain things that are important to ALL types of fiction, and any good writer/critiquer should be able to pick them out.
I get some of my best critiques from people who 'never read science fiction'." - Joan Shapiro Read how other critiques are done.