Tags: Narrative Essay Examples For CollegeConsuming Life ThesisCreative Writing 5th GradeSmall Business Plan Template FreeColumbia Essay Questions 2012Java Programming Homework HelpAdvantages Of Teamwork EssaysProthesis KneeAutocad Research Paper
We also want to note that using the hook and an I approach is ultimately less a matter of sheer quantity -- X number of sentences or paragraphs to others, and Y number to your ideas -- than of argumentative quality.Good introductions do not just repeat what other scholars have said; they analyze it and find an opening in it for their contribution.
You might opt for the all-hook intro because you want to demonstrate up front your mastery of a body of relevant scholarship.
A noble rationale, but one that often has the unfortunate effect of suggesting to readers that you are so immersed in that scholarship that you haven’t figured out your own point of view.
Those three purposes are to: Applying the Strategies In practical terms, the main challenge of writing effective introductions is finding the sweet spot in which you properly balance your presentation of others’ work with your own ideas.
We have two main suggestions for hitting that spot.
This advice about avoiding the no hook and all I introduction may initially seem to run counter to the bold-pronouncement strategy we outlined above, but a closer look reveals that it is a distinctive variation, a “first I and then hook” progression.
The strategy involves moving from your arresting assertion to the context that sharpens its stakes.
Consequences This approach to introductions has ripple effects on the larger activity of writing an effective essay. We often find that authors use their first paragraphs for their abstracts.
We do not recommend this tactic, because, as we have discussed in a related article, introductions and abstracts have different purposes.
At the same time, this possible objection helps clarify the situations in which it makes sense to employ the bold-pronouncement strategy: those in which readers of the journal will immediately recognize the striking quality of the thesis, the ways it seeks to take the scholarly conversation in a substantially new direction.
Why might authors go for just the hook or just the I?