In addition to spectatorship, this article critiques Hollywood's portrayal of black women and criticizes the lack of more substantial role opportunities.It acknowledges the importance of mass media as a powerful place for critical intervention.Cultures of domination rely on the cultivation of fear as a way to ensure obedience.
In addition to spectatorship, this article critiques Hollywood's portrayal of black women and criticizes the lack of more substantial role opportunities.It acknowledges the importance of mass media as a powerful place for critical intervention.Cultures of domination rely on the cultivation of fear as a way to ensure obedience.Tags: Essay On Non Conventional Energy ResourcesSolving Word Problems StrategiesWhere To Place Executive Summary In Research PaperThe Road Not Taken Essay OutlineReal Estate Assignment ContractLaw AssignmentsFreud Dream Analysis EssayGcse Textiles Coursework Existing ProductsExamples Of Personal Narrative Essays
Could the greed hooks says motivated Lewinsky to tell her story not also have been a realization that she deserved a better kind of love than Bill Clinton was offering her?
Or, a conflation on Lewinsky’s part of physical, male-dominated love with the kind of love that hooks’ admonishes our society for upholding as real and fulfilling?
Hooks relates the critical look to the media world, primarily film and television.
For the first time, when black people had the opportunity to see media, they realized that media maintained the ideas of white supremacy.
The Oppositional Gaze: Black Female Spectators In the article, bell hooks takes a historical look at black females as media spectators.
Bell hooks is a black feminist who calls attention to the negative aspects of white supremacy and capitalist patriarchy.Yet we do not question why we live in states of extreme anxiety and dread.Fear the primary force upholding structures of domination.A child who is presented to the world with clean clothes and a full belly may be utterly deprived of love and affection at home; a child who goes to bed hungry could be surrounding with love every moment of their lives.To hooks, this false equivocation perpetrates a cycle where parents who grew up without love go on to have children who grow up without love in their lives.It’s been my experience that people don’t tend to cut off their families unless things have reached nuclear wasteland levels of toxicity, and pushing someone to stay while preaching about self-love and affirming communities is quite hypocritical.Particularly since hooks devotes an entire essay on how society has equated parents caring for their children with love.To that point, although she considers her nuclear family to be dysfunctional, hooks credits her extended family with supporting her through her childhood and demonstrating how love should be manifested within the family.I think this credit has a tendency to cloud her judgement — at one point, she encouraged her lesbian sister to maintain ties with their hateful and homophobic family simply because their had to be some sane ones in the lot somewhere.She does spend some time on how marital love is different from the passionate love that Hollywood says women should aspire to, but her primary solution to this lack of love is to encourage a more community-based version of love.For people to put more stock into the friendships they form, to accept that single parent homes are often supported by friends who take on godmother roles, to renew the ties with their larger family structures.