Good And Evil Essay Conclusion

Good And Evil Essay Conclusion-23
The idea is further developed in Late Antiquity by Neoplatonists, Gnostics, and Church Fathers. The nature of being good has been given many treatments; one is that the good is based on the natural love, bonding, and affection that begins at the earliest stages of personal development; another is that goodness is a product of knowing truth.This development from the relative or habitual to the absolute is also evident in the terms ethics and morality both being derived from terms for "regional custom", Greek ήθος and Latin mores, respectively (see also siðr). Differing views also exist as to why evil might arise.Jung interpreted the story of Jesus as an account of God facing his own shadow.

Tags: Can Someone Do An Essay For MeAdvantages Of Outsourcing Seo Content Writing ServicesDissertation QuestionsEssays On Spring And AllIs Homework UsefulRice Research PapersFor Writing A Biology Lab ReportEffects Peer Pressure EssayOnline Business Writing Classes

Benedict de Spinoza states: Friedrich Nietzsche, in a rejection of the Judeo-Christian morality, addresses this in two works, Beyond Good and Evil and On the Genealogy of Morals, where he essentially says that the natural functional non-good has been socially transformed into the religious concept of evil by the slave mentality of the weak and oppressed masses who resent their masters (the strong).

He also makes a critique of morality by saying that many who consider themselves to be moral are simply acting from cowardice (wanting to do evil but scared of the repercussions).

This idea developed into a religion which spawned many sects, some of which embraced an extreme dualistic belief that the material world should be shunned and the spiritual world should be embraced.

Gnostic ideas influenced many ancient religions which teach that gnosis (variously interpreted as enlightenment, salvation, emancipation or 'oneness with God') may be reached by practising philanthropy to the point of personal poverty, sexual abstinence (as far as possible for hearers, total for initiates) and diligently searching for wisdom by helping others.

Carl Jung, in his book Answer to Job and elsewhere, depicted evil as the dark side of the Devil.

People tend to believe evil is something external to them, because they project their shadow onto others.

In cultures with Buddhist spiritual influence, both good and evil are perceived as part of an antagonistic duality that itself must be overcome through achieving Śūnyatā meaning emptiness in the sense of recognition of good and evil being two opposing principles but not a reality, emptying the duality of them, and achieving a oneness.

The modern philosophical questions regarding good and evil are subsumed into three major areas of study: meta-ethics concerning the nature of good and evil, normative ethics concerning how we ought to behave, and applied ethics concerning particular moral issues.

All of these are states of lacking and have no real existence. `Abdu'l-Bahá, son of the founder of the religion, in Some Answered Questions states: "Nevertheless a doubt occurs to the mind—that is, scorpions and serpents are poisonous.

Are they good or evil, for they are existing beings?


Comments Good And Evil Essay Conclusion

The Latest from ©