Other method he uses is the description of how he views “men” vs. And the last method he uses to further his argument is the use of hyperbole, exaggeration through out the essay.First method of development Dave uses to further his argument is a comparision and gender biased generalization.Well, to be honest, guys may not even have feelings.Tags: 8 Characteristics Of Critical ThinkingGroup Insurance Plans For Small BusinessesEssay Writing How To Be A Good StudentCritical Thinking JobsHalloween Creative Writing PromptsChesapeake Bay Pollution ThesisMothers Are Special EssaysThe Hardest Math ProblemCritical Essays On The Stranger By Albert Camus
All in all, this essay was a really enjoyable read.
“Men” written by Dave Barry, presents Dave’s perception on the difference between “Guys” and “Men”.
Guys are also relentlessly competitive creatures, and they strive to be the best at whatever they do.
It does not matter if the contest in question is completely pointless and irrelevant; guys still have to outdo one another.
Dave presents his essay in a comical way that generalizes the “men” vs. Dave argues that men hold too much of responsibilities and many expectations in which guys do not and they live happier life.
One of the methods he uses to support his argument is a comparison.
Dave’s use of logos play significant role here to support his argument.
Not only he compares guys and women, but also guys with his auxiliary dog. He compares that guys do not follow rules even though they know they are not suppose to do things they do, just like his small auxiliary backup dog.
Most of his points and accusations are really true.
I think that guys really do have an attraction to extremely complex machinery and enjoy tinker-toys.