The analytical features of a literature review might: It is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers.First, there are the primary studies that researchers conduct and publish.Tags: Proper Research Paper OutlineRedefining The American Dream EssaysTypes Of Quotations In EssaysCritical Analysis Essay The Yellow WallpaperIct Coursework DatabasesEssay On My Hobby Photography
We will get into some tricks on how to cut down on the useless articles a little later.
Most literature reviews are done using online services, such as Psyc Info or Science Direct.
Maybe you can adapt your study to answer questions that others are having trouble with.
The second reason is that writing down what is happening in the field gives readers a basic understanding of current research and points out the gap your research is going to fill.
In your literature review, you'll include a very brief summary of the most relevant and interesting parts of the research you read about.
Sometimes you will focus only on the results, sometimes it will be on the studies' participants, and sometimes it will just be what the researchers missed or didn't look at. In a literature review, you can have headings (Human Minds) and subheadings (Learning).
A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories.
A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research problem.
The researcher's name (Huk) and the year he published his work (1999) are displayed in APA-style citation.
The specifics of how all that works is a little more advanced than we need to get into in this lesson, but I thought it'd be good for you to get some exposure to what a proper literature review looks like.