But yet I take liberty to say, that these propositions are so far from having an universal assent, that there are a great part of mankind to whom they are not so much as known. Not on the mind naturally imprinted, because not known to children, idiots, &c.For, first, it is evident, that all children and idiots have not the least apprehension or thought of them.This present web page is modified from the Jones-edition, with an add-on This indexing/search system is prepared by Tze-wan Kwan and Chong-fuk Lau of the CUHK with Glimpse 3.0.
But yet I take liberty to say, that these propositions are so far from having an universal assent, that there are a great part of mankind to whom they are not so much as known. Not on the mind naturally imprinted, because not known to children, idiots, &c.For, first, it is evident, that all children and idiots have not the least apprehension or thought of them.Tags: Why Is A Literature Review ImportantAutoethnography DissertationCbc Spouses EssayEssay About Why English Is Important In EducationPhd Thesis On Wireless Ad - Hoc NetworkApplicant Letter Of RejectionPreschool Homework WorksheetsDuties And Responsibilities Of An Nco EssayCollateral Assignment Of LeaseUk Essay Marking Service
For I imagine any one will easily grant that it would be impertinent to suppose the ideas of colours innate in a creature to whom God hath given sight, and a power to receive them by the eyes from external objects: and no less unreasonable would it be to attribute several truths to the impressions of nature, and innate characters, when we may observe in ourselves faculties fit to attain as easy and certain knowledge of them as if they were originally imprinted on the mind. There is nothing more commonly taken for granted than that there are certain principles, both speculative and practical, (for they speak of both), universally agreed upon by all mankind: which therefore, they argue, must needs be the constant impressions which the souls of men receive in their first beings, and which they bring into the world with them, as necessarily and really as they do any of their inherent faculties. But, which is worse, this argument of universal consent, which is made use of to prove innate principles, seems to me a demonstration that there are none such: because there are none to which all mankind give an universal assent.
He therefore that talks of innate notions in the understanding, cannot (if he intend thereby any distinct sort of truths) mean such truths to be in the understanding as it never perceived, and is yet wholly ignorant of.
For if these words to be in the understanding have any propriety, they signify to be understood.
I shall here only, and that very readily, allow, that these maxims and mathematical demonstrations are in this different: that the one have need of reason, using of proofs, to make them out and to gain our assent; but the other, as soon as understood, are, without any the least reasoning, embraced and assented to.
But I withal beg leave to observe, that it lays open the weakness of this subterfuge, which requires the use of reason for the discovery of these general truths: since it must be confessed that in their discovery there is no use made of reasoning at all.