Physicians used anti-abortion laws, pushed in state legislatures, to increase their own stature and undermine their opponents. Of course, many would have narrated this story very differently.Some physicians claimed that this campaign was a product of superior medical knowledge.Tags: 1000 Word Essay PagesGeography AssignmentPtlls Level 3 AssignmentsProblem Solving Method In MathematicsFederal Resume Writing Service ReviewsEssays On Evolution Of Mass MediaWood Working CourseAn Introduction To Statistical Problem Solving In GeographyEssays On Cat PopultionHomework Note
 But in the 1960s, some Americans began to demand change from their states.
In 1959 the American Law Institute, a group of professionals that put together model legislation, advocated for the liberalization of abortion law.
While this loophole allowed many women to obtain abortions, it also made doctors the ultimate arbiters of the morality and legality of abortions.
These laws also created a large black market for women who could not access or obtain abortions through medical channels.
Is the antiabortion movement no longer relevant in the United States?
Those who would answer yes might suffer from myopia.Some historians have suggested that laws against post-quickening abortions were primarily intended to protect the health of the pregnant woman—not fetal life—as it was much more common for women to die during abortions that used instruments rather than herbal abortifacients.Whatever the rationale, few abortions were prosecuted before the mid-nineteenth century because quickening was so difficult to prove.But what has remained is the effect this movement has had on women’s lives.In the end, the pro-life movement transformed ideas as it also restricted the real ability of American women to access reproductive healthcare.Many argued that women (and rag-tag group of healers who offered abortion) did not have adequate embryonic knowledge to determine when life began.But historians have noted that this medical insight was not a result of any advancements in embryonic knowledge.The first “right-to-life” movement was not led by grassroots activists, but rather physicians, anxious about their professional status.Before then, physicians had been a largely unregulated bunch, without the institutional or cultural authority to corner the market on healing.Women’s bodies, not their words or actions, confessed to doctors the “naturalness” of uninterrupted reproduction and the “truth” about fetal life. Bodily processes could “speak for themselves,” though they did need doctors to translate. By 1900 every state had a law forbidding abortion at any stage, whether through the use of drugs or procedures.Almost all the laws passed during this time included a therapeutic exception, where licensed physicians could provide abortions at their own discretion as long as the abortion preserved the life of the mother.