Some may argue that there is not enough concrete evidence to use deterrence as an argument for the death penalty.
Some may argue that there is not enough concrete evidence to use deterrence as an argument for the death penalty.Tags: Closing Statement For A Cover LetterEssays About NonfictionCreative Writing PoemsConclusion Generator For EssaysEnglish Identity EssayGeorge Meredith Essay On Comedy TextAnne Carson The Glass EssayThesis Statement On Dancehall MusicModel Act Essays
This can influence the effectiveness of deterrence because punishments that are carried out swiftly are better examples to others.
Although the death penalty is already effective at deterring possible criminals, it would be even more effective if the legal process were carried out more quickly instead of having inmates on death row for years.
The death penalty also carries out retribution justly.
“Deserved punishment protects society morally by restoring this just order, making the wrongdoer pay a price equivalent to the harm he has done.” (Budziszewski).
Inmates are first given a large dose of an anesthetic so they do not feel any pain (Bosner); this proves that the process is made as humane as possible so the inmates do not physically suffer.
Although the issue of morality is very personal for many people, it is important to see the facts and realize that capital punishment does take morality into account and therefore is carried out in the best way possible.The morality of the death penalty has been hotly debated for many years.Those opposed to the death penalty say that it is immoral for the government to take the life of a citizen under any circumstance.There are many reasons as to why I believe the death penalty should be legalized in all states, including deterrence, retribution, and morality; and because opposing arguments do not hold up, I will refute the ideas that the death penalty is unconstitutional, irrevocable mistakes are made, and that there is a disproportionality of race and income level.The use of capital punishment greatly deters citizens from committing crimes such as murder.This lack of malice is proven in the simple definition of retribution: “retribution is a state sponsored, rational response to criminality that is justified given that the state is the victim when a crime occurs” (“Justifications for Capital Punishment).The death penalty puts the scales of justice back in balance after they were unfairly tipped towards the criminal.In a study conducted by Isaac Ehrlich in 1973, it was found that for each execution of a criminal seven potential victim’s lives were saved (Death Penalty Curricula for High School).This was due to other possible murderers being deterred from committing murder after realizing thatother criminals are executed for their crimes.Retribution also serves justice for murder victims and their families.Some may see this as revenge, but this retribution is not motivated by malice, rather it is motivated by the need for justice and the principle of lex talionis (“an eye for an eye”) (Green).