Tags: Problem Solving ThinkingPssa Essay QuestionsImportance Literature ReviewSir George Savile Essay On King Charles IiHow To Solve World ProblemsGed Essay Questions And Answers
We are the reason for the global warning, leak of chemicals in our food and water supplies.Yes, water bottles do make it easier for us to carry around but what we don’t know if that our pocket is paying the price of pollution leading to health issues. Speaker Credibility: I was one of the people that used water bottles because it made it easier for me to have water throughout the day.“This seemed to suggest that it was the act of bottling the water that was contributing most of the plastic,” she says.
“Bottled water is marketed as though it’s cleaner than tap, but numerous studies show it’s definitely not cleaner,” Mason says.
“Based on all the data we have, you’re going to be drinking significantly less plastic from tap water out of a glass than if you go and buy bottled water.” A statement from Nestlé Waters North America included assurances of their water products’ quality and safety.
“Unfortunately, we do not currently know the toxicological outcomes of these exposures,” she says.
The notion that plastics are accumulating in our bodies “is uncomfortable and scary,” she says.
However, after researching and having a first hand experience with seeing animals that died due to plastic water bottles.
I chose to make less of an impact on our environment. Thesis: Plastic water bottles were created to make our life easier; however the pollution it has made has linked to cancer and chemicals not known fifty years ago. Another study published this year found microplastic contamination in U. “We know they get into our body through ingestion and inhalation, and depending on their size, we know they usurp the natural physiological barriers.” This means some of these plastic particles are small enough to pass through the body’s protective tissues and into the bloodstream and organs, she explains.There’s also evidence in animals and lab tissues that suggests females who are pregnant may pass these microplastics on to their unborn offspring.In 2010 alone, up to 12 million metric tons were dumped into the world’s oceans, the study found.Ironically, the volume and variety of plastic-related exposures is another of the major challenges researchers face when attempting to show that these pollutants could be making people sick.“We’re all exposed to so many chemicals every day that if you’re 30 and you develop some rare form of cancer, no one’s ever going to be able to connect that to something you were exposed to,” Mason says.“Making that connection is basically impossible.” More of Mason’s research has found plastic contamination in tap water, beer and sea salt.that analyzed samples taken from 259 bottled waters sold in several countries and found that 93% of them contained “microplastic” synthetic polymer particles. “Some were definitely visible without a magnifying glass or microscope,” says Sherri Mason, author of the study and a sustainability researcher at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. Samples from the brands tested varied in plastic concentrations, and the average across brands was 325 microplastic particles per liter of bottled water, researchers found.The 11 bottled water brands tested in Mason’s study are among the most popular and widely available in the U. Nestlé Pure Life had the largest average concentration of plastic particles out of all the brands tested; one sample from the brand was found to contain more than 10,000 microplastic particles per liter.“But the studies to prove [negative effects] need to be done.” Other researchers say we know enough already to deem these plastic exposures a threat to human health.“In animal models and in epidemiological studies in humans, we have a correlation between plastic exposures and known health hazards,” says Frederick vom Saal, a distinguished professor emeritus of biological sciences at the University of Missouri.