Moreover, they fail to recognize that traditions and religions should not be used against same sex couples because there are people who do not ascribe to any tradition(s) or religions.Conclusion Same sex marriage is a human right that should be enjoyed just like traditional heterosexual marriages.Arguments made against this form of marriage, such as that it undermines traditional marriages, are based on opinions and not facts. Same-sex marriage should be legal because it is a fundamental human right.
Moreover, they fail to recognize that traditions and religions should not be used against same sex couples because there are people who do not ascribe to any tradition(s) or religions.Conclusion Same sex marriage is a human right that should be enjoyed just like traditional heterosexual marriages.Tags: Graphic Organizer For Argumentative EssayMacbeth Compelling Drama EssayDescriptive Essay About SchoolShould Animal Be Kept In Zoo EssayMoney And Education EssayMini Research PaperPoetry Analysis Essay Annabel LeeDo Want Nurse EssaysConstruction Management Graduate Cover LetterCollateral Assignment Of Lease
Moreover, the definition of marriage does not suggest that it should only be an exclusive union between two people of opposite sexes.
According to Gerstmann (2017), marriage is a formally or legally recognized union between two people in a personal relationship.
As per this definition, people should be allowed to marry once they are in love with each other irrespective of their genders.
Reducing marriage to a union between a man and woman is thus a direct infringement into the rights of homosexuals.
As one would concur, even some heterosexual couples are not able to sire their own children and resort to adopting one or even more.
This is a right that should be extended to same sex couples too given that they may not be able to give birth on their own.
At school, the children get to be cared for and mentored by both male and female teachers who more or less serve almost the same role as parents.
Those who are opposed to same sex unions may also argue that such marriages reduce sanctity of marriage.
In case one of them dies, the surviving partner would have no right over the property under the deceased’s name even if they both funded its acquisition.
Legalizing same-sex unions would cushion homosexual partners from such unfortunate situations.