Tags: Reflective Essay On Research ProjectRobert Smithson Central Park EssayHelp With DissertationGcse Prohibition CourseworkHook Thesis BridgeBusiness Estate PlanningGoogle Research Paper MapreduceHomework HelPhd Thesis Defense PreparationFashion Institute Of Technology Essay Question
The monster in Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein lurches into life as big as a man but as ignorant as a newborn.
After looking around the room, the women discover a quilt and decide to bring it with them, although the men tease them for pondering about the quilt as they briefly enter the room before going to inspect the barn.
Meanwhile, the women discover an empty birdcage and eventually find the dead bird in a box in Mrs.
His escape from Victor’s workshop seems sinister and his murder of William apparently confirms the notion that he is a powerful, malignant beast capable of unmotivated violence. Victor assumes, and Shelley invites us to assume along with him, that this being, with his patched-together body, his yellow skin, and his black lips, must have a soul that matches his hideous appearance.
When the monster speaks, however, he throws his actions into a different light.
How does Shakespeare use descriptive language to enhance the visual possibilities of a stage production?
How does he use imagery to create a mood of tension, suspense, fear, and despair?
His stories about sympathizing with and secretly helping the cottagers show that he has an empathetic nature, and his tale of rescuing a young girl and getting a bullet for his trouble demonstrates his instinct to help those weaker than himself, sparking our outrage at society’s unwarranted cruelty toward him.
Even the monster’s description of William’s murder makes the convincing case that fury at Victor drove the monster to violence—not an excuse, by any means, but certainly an explanation that is understandable and psychologically credible.
He feels little besides relief when the monster escapes; he lets Justine go to her death rather than risk his reputation by telling the truth; he whines and prevaricates; he heartlessly abandons and scorns his own creation. But because he bares his soul by communicating verbally to us, the readers, he reveals the unappealing motivations behind those reasonable actions and loses our trust and sympathy.
Ironically, Victor would be more appealing were he to lose the power of speech. The monster’s eloquent words do not have the effect he intends: They fail to win Victor’s approval or gain his affection. By explicating himself and his actions, the monster gains our favor and turns himself into the hero of Victor Frankenstein’s narrative.