The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living Essay

The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living Essay-80
Socrates believed over analysing and examining our lives would lead to better ones, whereas De Montaigne would advise us to spend less time over-analysing and overthinking things as it leads to insecurities that we are all far better off without.

Tags: Effects Of The French Revolution EssayThe Birthmark Essay On SettingStages Of Problem Solving ProcessEvaluation Media EssayHousekeeping Business PlanDessay Queen

As one analyzes the "Apology" by Plato, one is able to analyze and contrast and most people would agree with Socrates when he claims that "..unexamined life is not worth living...".

From a more personal standpoint I would completely agree with Socrates point of view, due to the fact most of us in society have chosen to live the "unexamined life" for centuries and as a result we live in a society where one has to live segregated from our freewill as human beings as well as a society that is restrained by rules and other types of social "walls".

Socrates is correct when he says the “the unexamined life is not worth living” In order to discuss why Socrates is correct, I would like to discuss these various points which consist of: the significance as well as the underlying meaning of his quote “the unexamined life is not worth living”, the difference between an unexamined life and an examined life, specific examples, the importance of a person living an examined life and lastly, whether or not I’m living an examined life. Socrates believed that Philosophy was primarily a social activity, which in fact he made use of quite often.

Socrates was a Greek philosopher who lived from 469-399 B. He would find himself roaming the streets of Athens questioning the youth or just anyone who would give him the chance to talk to them.

Epicurus and Socrates have different approaches to the phrase “analysing life”.

Epicurus would advise not to spend money as temporary relief for a bad day but rather take time out and reflect and contemplate. Epicurus believes that analysing your life is one third of what it takes to have a happy life whereas Socrates believes that if you are not constantly reviewing and examining every aspect of your life just so you can get the best out of it, it’s not worth living in general.Furthermore, Socrates questions drove people absolutely insane, until the point of absolute consternation if you will.He tried proving a point which is quoted “Look, here we are, two ignorant men, yet two, men who desire to know.He believed that human have a tendency to over-think things and that’s mainly where our unhappiness comes from.To be happy De Montaigne knew that we didn’t need intelligence and brain facts, we required wisdom and life experience.De Montaigne urged us to live the best lives we possibly can by simply not worry about our appearance, accept our own and everyone else’s culture, and always endeavour to become wiser.De Montaigne had quite the opposite approach on how to live a happy life to Socrates.Upon being put to death for teaching false doctrines and corrupting the youth of Athens.Socrates said something before being put to death that would eventually be known as one of the most illustrious quotes throughout philosophy, which would seem to echo into the generations to come.Socrates seemed to overlook other factors that account to our happiness and give worth to our lives.In disagreement with Socrates; We all must contemplate now and again but only to a certain extent, as it can be disastrous to overthink and reconsider every aspect of our life.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living Essay

The Latest from ecotext2.ru ©