Thesis On Corporate Crime

Thesis On Corporate Crime-9
While the main characteristic is the foundation—economic crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of an occupation—other aspects lack precision (Kang and Thosuwanchot Edwin Sutherland is one of the most cited criminologists in the history of the criminology research field.Sutherland’s work has inspired and motivated a large number of scholars in the field associated with his work.

While the main characteristic is the foundation—economic crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of an occupation—other aspects lack precision (Kang and Thosuwanchot Edwin Sutherland is one of the most cited criminologists in the history of the criminology research field.Sutherland’s work has inspired and motivated a large number of scholars in the field associated with his work.

Tags: Writing An Academic Essay In The Third PersonDemystifying The DissertationCognitive Critical ThinkingAn Introduction To Statistical Problem Solving In GeographyKorean War Research PaperCompare Contrast Essay FormatPersuasive Essay On SpeedingResearch Papers On Diabetes MellitusGeorgia Tech Admission Essays

One of the theoretical challenges facing scholars is to develop an accepted definition of white-collar crime.

The main characteristic is that it is economic crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of an occupation.

Businesspeople and professionals frequently commit serious wrongdoing and harm with little fear of facing criminal justice scrutiny.

It is often the case that poverty and powerlessness is the cause of one kind of crime while excessive power can be the cause of another kind of crime.

Next, is the extent of damage caused by white-collar crime.

Sutherland emphasized the disproportionate extent of harm caused by the crime of the wealthy in comparison to the much researched and popular focus on crime by the poor, and the equally disproportionate level of social control responses.One reason for this confusion is that white-collar crime in Sutherland’s research is both a crime committed by a specific type of person and a specific type of crime.Later research has indicated, as applied in this book, that white-collar crime is no specific type of crime; it is only a crime committed by a specific type of person.Fourth, the construction of the corporation as an offender indicates that organizations can also be held accountable for misconduct and crime.Finally, there is the ability to theorize the deviant behaviors of elite members.Sutherland’s long-lasting influence on criminological, sociological and, more recently, on management thinking is observable across the globe, but in particular in the United States and Europe.Sutherland exposed crime by people who were thought of as almost superior, and who apparently did not need to offend as a means of survival.This learning theory of deviance focuses on how individuals learn to become criminals.Differential association theory assumes that criminal behavior is learned in interaction with other persons.Sutherland’s contribution to the challenge of concepts such as law and crime can be considered one of the strengths of his work as he showed that laws and legal distinctions are politically and socially produced in very specific ways.For lawmakers, there is nothing intrinsic to the character of white-collar offenses that makes them somehow different from other types of offenses.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Thesis On Corporate Crime

The Latest from ecotext2.ru ©