He felt that ending his life would be more beneficial than as living as Hyde for the rest of his life. “Robert Louis Stevenson’s Jekyll and Hyde and the Double Brain. ” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 46.
He felt that ending his life would be more beneficial than as living as Hyde for the rest of his life. “Robert Louis Stevenson’s Jekyll and Hyde and the Double Brain. ” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 46.Tags: Marketing Thesis ReportResearch Paper On Talent ManagementHomework Solutions CheggValue Of Kindness EssayHow To Solve Chemistry Word ProblemsWinter Break EssayOrganize Research Papers IpadThesis About Electrical Power DistributionThe Great Gastby Essay
Is the Novel a Pretty Clear Case of Split Personality? Its message is blatant and clear: humankind has two very distinct sides to its personality, one of God-fearing goodness and one of temptation and evil.
Hyde wears its Christian morality very prominently on its shoulders.
However, before the murders start happening, we already know of the absolute nature of Hyde’s characters through the use of an, especially out-of-date plot contrivance.
We know Hyde is evil simply because of his appearance.
The left-brained Jekyll overpowered his right-brain urges which lead to the creation of the second persona.
This secondary persona starts off as the weaker of the two but eventually grows stronger.Stevenson, despite the declamatory absolutism of his message, allows an alternative to sneak through.And a libertarian reading of the text is quite possible, partly because of turns of phrase that Stevenson let slip through his tract.Everyone who knew Jekyll thought he was a respected doctor who was well mannered. Little did they know he had an evil alter ego, Hyde, which was hidden by the disguise of Jekyll. Eventually Jekyll decided to come to a conclusion “Though so profound a double-dealer, I was in no sense a hypocrite; both sides of me were in dead earnest” (Stevenson 42). Jekyll explains that both his sides were equally alike and learns how to deal with each side. Jekyll could not have possibly foreseen what problems his separate identities would cause. Jekyll tries to make up for the evil but the situation is morally uncertain. Jekyll’s possible innocence becomes more doubtful since the two identities are two halves of the same self. Jekyll’s eagerness to put on a mask and taste life of the evil self that has produced these horrible results in the first place. This explains that the evil Hyde completely takes over the good Jekyll side because it was hidden for so long that it needed to be expressed. Hyde’s intention was to be able to live his passions freely and to fulfill the evil inclinations that live in his mind without any moral restraints or limits. “That thing was not my master, and there’s the truth…My master is a tall, fine build of a man, and this was more of a dwarf.”The two mindsets seem to contradict: humankind is judged by God and born with evil in them, and yet evil is also a separate thing, an extra physical cancer.But perhaps that is precisely the point, given the onset of temptation, cancer can grow within us, as Christian morality would have it.