There are pages in Tom Sawyer and in Life on the Mississippi which are, within their limits, as good as anything with which one can compare them in Huckleberry Finn; and in other books there are drolleries just as good of their kind.
There are pages in Tom Sawyer and in Life on the Mississippi which are, within their limits, as good as anything with which one can compare them in Huckleberry Finn; and in other books there are drolleries just as good of their kind.Tags: A Midsummer Nights Dream Research PaperTechnology Can Solve Our Environmental ProblemsHomework Tasks Year 6Hooks In An EssayGcse History Coursework Jack The RipperProposal Writing DissertationsVideo Game Violence EssayWhat Does A Business Continuity Plan Typically IncludeWhere To Put Page Numbers In A Research Paper
He sees the real world; and he does not judge it—he allows it to judge itself. But he has his aunt; he has, as we learn later, other relatives; and he has the environment into which he fits. When there is a secret band to be formed, it is Tom who organizes it and prescribes the rules.
Huck Finn is alone: there is no more solitary character in fiction.
The opinion of my parents that it was a book unsuitable for boys left me, for most of my life, under the impression that it was a book suitable only for boys.
Therefore it was only a few years ago that I read for the first time, and in that order, Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn.
But the point of view of the narrator is that of an adult observing a boy.
And Tom is the ordinary boy, though of quicker wits, and livelier imagination, than most.In the second book their nominal relationship remains the same; but here it is Tom who has the secondary role.The author was probably not conscious of this, when he wrote the first two chapters: Huckleberry Finn is not the kind of story in which the author knows, from the beginning, what is going to happen.The River and the Boy make their appearance in it; the narrative is good; and there is also a very good picture of society in a small mid-Western river town (for St.Petersburg is more Western than Southern) a hundred years ago.Tom Sawyer did not prepare me for what I was to find its sequel to be.Tom Sawyer seems to me to be a boys’ book, and a very good one.I cannot speak from memory: I suspect that a fear on the part of my parents lest I should acquire a premature taste for tobacco, and perhaps other habits of the hero of the story, kept the book out of my way.But Huckleberry Finn does not fall into the category of juvenile fiction.Tom then disappears from our view; and when he returns, he has only two functions. Huck’s persisting admiration for Tom only exhibits more clearly to our eyes the unique qualities of the former and the commonplaceness of the latter.Tom has the imagination of a lively boy who has read a good deal of romantic fiction: he might, of course, become a writer—he might become Mark Twain.